My friend, salmon, recently informed me that wine-in-a-box can be purchased in individual portions, like jumbo juice boxes for grown-ups. I keep meaning to tell my grandmother this. For a short time after they retired, she and my grandfather had a small vineyard in New Jersey. They made and bottled their own wine, mostly drunk by our immediate family but also tasted at local get-togethers with other farmers struggling to make grapes happy on the East Coast. Grandma has told me more than once that wine-in-a-box, or more specifically wine-in-a-bag-in-a-box, is a better way to store wine over a long period of time without losing flavor.
It appears that vintners in Canada agree with her as several wineries have foregone traditional glass bottles in favor of the box. Usman Valiante, a contributor to Canada’s Solid Waste and Recycling Magazine, weighs the environmental and viticultural pros and cons of this decision on the blog he keeps off the magazine’s Web site. Aside from trashing the taste of the wines he sampled, Valiante explains that the materials used to store the drinks aren’t as green as the vineyards imply. He also points out the irony in the label “Recyclable–where facilities exist.” I guess I’ll have to stick to sangria in a thermos at picnics.
Thursday, September 21, 2006 at 9:04 am |
what’s worse, wasteful packaging or wasting wine when you’re not a lush enough to drink an entire bottle before it goes to vinegar?
Thursday, September 21, 2006 at 10:58 am |
definitely the former. though, if you ever doubt your lush capacity, by all means call me!
Sunday, December 12, 2010 at 4:39 pm |
wine-in-a-box everydaytrash was a great read. Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people, very interesting article, keep up it coming 🙂